WWII)

Communist enemies

• traitorous foreigners

The media continues to perpetuate some of the stereotypes of “foreignness.” I remember last year when some illegal Chinese immigrants were (from a single rumor started by their disgruntled smuggler) accused of bringing a nuclear bomb to Boston. The Globe put their pictures boldly on the front page—eight pictures stretching across the entire page. Later when it was shown that the rumor had absolutely no basis in truth, a retraction/apology was printed on one of the inner pages—I never actually saw it myself.

I also remember at the time of the Wen Ho Lee case (do all ya’ll know just how badly this guy was wronged?) that at least one survey I read about said that an overwhelming majority of Americans believed that a Chinese American’s fundamental loyalty lay with China and not the U.S.

Well… I don’t want to digress too much, but this is why I’ve been more and more interested in Asian American issues in the past couple of years. Why I moved to Dorchester to be around high-risk Vietnamese youth. Being Asian American is not an easy thing, no matter what some might tell you.

Anyway.

Overall, I found the book very informative and (as I said earlier) it filled a lot of gaps in my knowledge of Chinese American history. It wasn’t necessarily a quick read for me even though I thought it was pretty well written. I guess I just don’t really like reading history.

It also made me think of two other books that I really like:

Free at Last? was (for me) a first glimpse into the African-American experience. So I grew up in a suburban/rural, mostly white neighborhood and knew hardly anything about Asian American history, let alone African or Latino. And, being totally honest, I used to be against affirmative action (for academic admissions) because I saw it as a system that worked against me just because I happened to be Chinese. I’ve learned a lot over the past five years or so that have helped me to understand why affirmative action is important. And I’ve made friends that have made me want to learn more about Black history. This book was a first step. I still don’t know anything, but now I know a little more about what I don’t know.

Reviving Ophelia is such an important book for men to read. I guess it’s about developmental psychology in adolescent girls. When I read it, it totally floored me. It helped me to understand the toxic environment that girls grow up in, something that, as a man, I had no way of understanding. This is not at all to say that it’s not tough being a boy (or a man), but there are definitely some weird gender dynamics that sometimes make me wonder that any woman could ever learn to trust a man. I need to read this again—soon. If you’re a man, read this. Really. And if you’re a woman? Every woman I’ve talked with about this book has found it really helpful. So everyone should read it.

http://blog.markstudy.org/?p=10 SCMZZZZZZZ.jpg” alt=“The Challenge of Jesus: Rediscovering Who Jesus Was and Is” />Well, I finally finished my first book since starting to “blog” so I figure I should write about it. There’s a part of me that wants to go back and review all the books/movies I really love, but most of them would need to be re-read before I’d have anything intelligent to say about them.

I’m actually not sure I have anything intelligent to say about The Challenge of Jesus anyway, unfortunately, even though I just finished reading it. I really wanted to like this book, having a number of friends who really liked it. But I definitely had mixed feelings. Part of it was really good, bringing meaning to rather cryptic sayings/actions of Jesus. Part of it was frustratingly sparse, making statements about 1st century Judaism that seemed plausible but without, IMHO, enough substantiating evidence. Part of it just went over my head, using theological jargon/references that the lay scholar just wouldn’t be familiar with. I’m no slouch when it comes to Bible studies, but I’m no seminarian either. For a book that is aimed at a more popular audience, I would have wished for a little more readability. Or maybe it’s just ‘cause I’m a dumb American who doesn’t understand British English?

Anyway, the gist of the book (for me, anyway) was that current Christian thought has missed some of the import of Jesus’s life because we apply his life directly to ours instead of through the lens of a 1st century Jewish community. I’ll certainly grant that I don’t know jack about 1st century Judaism (besides the snippets that I’ve picked up in Bible studies over the years), but I also get the sense that Wright thinks that his own research into Jesus’s life is the most accurate which may very well be true but is hard for my skeptical mind to buy at face value. Perhaps that’s what I found most frustrating about the book.

On the flip side, I think the “Challenge” is real and profound. Jesus definitely came into a context that had certain expectations of what success might look like, but he had a totally different understanding of God’s plan for the redemption of the world through Israel. And, as the prophets of old, his life and death were symbolic of God’s message to Israel and to the world. But because of his special relationship with God, it was not simply symbolic, but actually God acting out his love in a real and tangible way.

Now that “Challenge” comes to us, the church, who must bring a message that is relevant to our cultural context. As always, it’s distressingly unclear what that might look like. But I think the nature of the message is pretty clear after all: “Our task is to announce in deed and word that the exile is over, to enact the symbols that speak of healing and forgiveness, to act boldly in God’s world in the power of the Spirit.”

That’s a pretty good message. That’s good news. How do we communicate it? That’s a good question and the subject of much thought and prayer. But that’s what life is about… Bringing good news to a world that sorely needs it.